सुशांत शायद आज आप लोगो से कुछ कहना चाहता है

 

सुशांत शायद आज आप लोगो से कुछ कहना चाहता है

शायद जिस्म की मौत इंसान की मौत नहीं होती , एक जिस्म था वो मर गया , एक इंसान था जो अभी ज़िंदा है और आप लोगो से कुछ कहना चाहता है , उसने कल भी कुछ कहना चाहा था लेकिन उसकी आवाज़ दबा दी गयी .वो सुशांत जो दिशा के लिए लड़ना चाहता था , जिसे कई लोगो ने बदनाम करने को कोशिश की , उसके परिवार पे लांछन लगाए , वो शायद आज आप लोगो से कुछ कहना चाहता है. लीजिये हम मुल्ज़िम सुशांत सिंह राजपूत को आपके सामने पेश करते हैं.

आज जब मैं इस देश की जनता से आखिरी बार बात कर रहा हूँ , तो मैं ये नहीं कहना चाहता की मैं सही था या गलत , अच्छा था या बुरा , क्या धर्म क्या मज़हब , मैं ऐसी कोई बात नहीं करना चाहता . क्युकी इस बात से कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ता , मेरा एक ही धर्म एक ही मज़हब था , वो ये की मैं भारत वासी हूँ. मैं कोई नहीं हूँ , कुछ नहीं हूँ.  लेकिन सुशांत कोई है , मैं मर  गया लेकिन सुशांत ज़िंदा है आप सब लोगो की सोंच में , आपके दिल मैं .. मैं कही नहीं हूँ , लेकिन सुशांत हर कही हैं .

वो सुशांत जिसे कई लोगो ने अपनी कामयाबी और पैसा कमाने की सीढ़ी समझा , जिसे अंकित , गणेश और अंकिता ने अपने सुख दुःख का साथी समझा और कई लोगो ने अपने रास्ते का काँटा समझा ,  उन्हें मुझसे कोई परेशानी नहीं थी , उन्हें परेशानी थी मेरे अंदर जाग उठे उस इंसान से जिसने एक सच्चे और अच्छे भारत के सपना देखा था. जो अन्याय के खिलाफ लड़ना चाहता था .

और आज अर्नब गोस्वामी जी जिस तरह से अन्याय और झूठ के  खिलाफ लड़ रहे हैं . मुझे उनके अंदर भी एक सुशांत दीखता है . 

आज अर्नब सिर्फ एक इंसान नहीं , एक चेतना , एक उम्मीद , एक सपने का नाम है , सपना की कभी किसी के खिलाफ साज़िश न हो , कोई अन्याय न हो . सच की हमेशा जीत हो . एक ऐसे भारत का सपना जो सबसे शक्तिशाली हो. जहा हर इंसान देश भक्त हो. .

दोस्तों तुम लोग मेरा लिए आंसू मत बहाना , मेरे लिए दुखी न होना , मर  गया तो मर गया , तुम मुझे भूल जाना , लेकिन सच्चाई का हमेशा साथ देना , 

अर्नब गोस्वामी का साथ देना मतलब मेरा साथ देना है ,  जब अर्नब जी को अपने लिए लड़ते देखता हूँ म तो उनकी आवाज़ में मुझे अपनी आवाज़ सुनाई देती है.

मैं तो अर्नब जी से कभी मिला  भी नहीं , उनसे मेरा कोई रिश्ता भी नहीं .  फिर भी वो अपनी जान हथेली प लेके मेरे और मेरे परिवार के लिए लड़ रहे हैं. मैं तो अर्नब जी से कभी मिला  भी नहीं , उनसे मेरा कोई रिश्ता भी नहीं .  फिर भी वो अपनी जान हथेली प लेके मेरे और मेरे परिवार के लिए लड़ रहे हैं. , मुझे नहीं लगता कि इसमें अर्नब जी का कोई व्यक्तिगत फायदा है , वो सिर्फ मेरे लिए नहीं , हर उस इंसान जो कमज़ोर है , जिसके साथ अन्याय हुआ है उसको इन्साफ दिलाने के लिए लड़ रहे है , वो भी इतने ज्यादा ताकतवर लोगो से., शायद इसीलिए आज पूरा देश अर्नब गोस्वामी और रिपब्लिक भारत के साथ खड़ा है. 

अर्नब जी मैं आपको नमन करता हूँ , और पूरा यकीन है कि आप सब इसी तरह इन्साफ के लिए लड़ते रहेंगे . 

नोट - ये एक काल्पनिक लेख है. , जब मैं अर्नब गोस्वामी जी को अकेले सबसे लड़ते देखता हूँ , तो मेरे दिल में जो भावनाये आती हैं , मैने बस वो लिखी हैं , मेरा राजनीति या पत्रकारिता से कोई लेना देना नहीं है.

Reply to Sonia Gandhi Questions on India China Standoff

Note : 

Please Note that intent of writing this article is just to make people of india aware on indo china standoff, every information is available over public domain , press releases and statements issued by responsible authorities, i just clubbed the information in one single article , and i dont own  the content or pics used in this article 

Sonia Gandhi Madam is a known politician of India who has certain questions in her mind regarding territorial integrity and national security of country and with due respect to her its our duty to clarify her doubts which i am trying to do in my this article . 

Reply to Sonia Gandhi Questions on India China Standoff

Today Congress Party President Mrs Sonia Gandhi put some questions in front of indian govt at all party meeting  , i tried finding answers to those questions and found that govt has already answered all the questions , except the tactical and strategic which obviously is classified and never revealed on public domain . Everything is available , its just  that information is scattered . so i thought of answering her questions one by one .

To understand the conflict its important to know this 

The most recent confrontations have taken place in four main points along the LAC: Pangong Lake, the Galwan River valley, the Hotsprings/Gogra area along the Ladakh border, and near Naku La in Sikkim. While they seemed to have been resolved through bilateral dialogue over the past few weeks, the situation along the northern banks of Pangong Lake in Ladakh, where the confrontations started, remains tense.

Chinese and Indian claims overlap significantly in this part of the LAC, but neither side officially acknowledges the extent of their overlapping claims along Pangong Lake. India colloquially describes the disputed area as ‘Fingers’ in reference to eight successive outcroppings of land into the lake, and asserts that the LAC starts at Finger 8, while the Chinese claim that it starts at Finger 2, which India dominates. At the beginning of the year, India’s most advanced post was located at Finger 3, while China’s was at Finger 8. Both sides regularly patrolled the area between Fingers 4 and 8 in support of their claims, but neither had occupied it permanently.

NOW LETS ANSWER SONIA GANDHI QUESTIONS

On which date did the Chinese troops intrude into our territory in Ladakh?"

China was never able to intrude even an inch in Indian Territory , and this has categorically been told by our prime minister  they just came close to LAC  to put pressure on India to stop infrastructure development in border area within Indian territory.   our brave hearts lost there life and killed 45 PLA soldiers to save Indias territorial integrity , they never let china intrude even an inch of out territory.

When did the government find out about the Chinese transgressions into our territory?" and "Was it on May 5th, as reported, or earlier?

Source - Tribune India 

India got the intelligence report of Chinese movement in April end , that why troops were ready to meet them  at Pangong Tso and at Naku La in North Sikkim. Where the scuffle happened on 5^th and 6^th may, as told in answer of previous question, china was never allowed transgression in our country.

"Does the government not receive, on a regular basis, satellite pictures of the borders of our country?""Did our external intelligence agencies not report any unusual activity along the LAC?"

As already told in previous answer India keeps a strong watch on developments at its borders. It  got the intelligence report and satellite pictures of Chinese movement in April end , that why troops were ready to meet them  at Pangong Tso and at Naku La in North Sikkim. Where the scuffle happened on 5^th and 6^th may, intelligence reports are not shared publicly or on twitter.

                 

                       SOME SATELLITE PICTURES OF CHINESE BUILD UP

Did the Military Intelligence not alert the government about the intrusion and the build-up of massive forces along the LAC, whether on the Chinese side or on the Indian side?"

This question is again of same nature as previous questions, Indian intelligence is as good as never before, and india got the intelligence information in advance of build up of troops on Chinese side , as regarding  “on the Indian side” , i reiterate  Indian soldiers never allowed china to intrude even an inch of Indian territory .

 "In the government's considered view, was there a failure of intelligence?"

No not at all , intelligence did very good work and India got the information at right time and so indian defense forces took action at right time, had India didn't got the intelligence at right time and Chinese would have been able to occupy strategic heights another kargil like war would have been happening right now.   

 REASON OF CONFLICT 

It was a road construction by India that triggered the recent face off in Ladakh leading to a violent clash between Indian and Chinese troops which left many injured on both sides earlier this month.

              watch this vedio to know more about this indo china border project 

With a troop build-up on the Chinese side, India also enhanced its defences. The army maintained that things have calmed and there is no face off in Eastern Ladakh now.

The Chinese had been objecting to a critical road construction project north of Pangong Tso (lake) that became a flashpoint. The contentious road was well within the Indian territory and far from the Chinese claim, the sources added.

“The Indian stand was that just like the Chinese have built a road in the area under their control we can do it on our side,” 

Another official privy to the developments said the Chinese had been exerting pressure to stop work on the road for some time but as the construction continued, it resulted in a face off.

With the recent skirmish being a result of infrastructure building by India close to the Line of Actual Control (LAC), the focus could shift to several other road works in areas. These constrictions could become potential flash points as India has been enhancing infrastructure in remote areas.

Finally I would like to tell that this all confrontation is a result of congress party not developing infrastructure in border with china , which is eminent by the speech of your own defense minister Mr. Antony.

Here's the complete timeline of how the tension escalated between both countries before 

6th June 2020

Late April: 

The tension regarding the boundary issue between India and China started building up.

May 5 and May 6: 

Scuffles at Pangong Tso and at Naku La in North Sikkim 

Chinese troops moved in in large numbers with vehicles and equipment objecting to road construction by India and have also pitched tents

Chinese troops are close to Finger 2 area of Pangong Tso area and were blocking indias movement forward.  The Pangong Tso is 135 km long and 5-7 km in width of which about one-third is held by India while the rest is held by China.

After the scuffle on May 5, both sides moved in additional troops and are entrenched there.

12 May: 

The Chinese military helicopters were seen flying close to the Line of Actual Control on at least a couple of occasions after which a fleet of Su-30 fighters of the Indian Air Force too were sent to carry our sorties in the area. Additional troops were also rushed into the site following the fracas.

23 May:

 Army Chief General Manoj Naravane visited the Leh-based 14 Corps headquarters to review the overall situation on the ground.

26 May: 

Chinese President Xi Jinping directed China’s armed forces to strengthen training of troops and to be ready for war.

State media reports quoted the Chinese premier as saying that it was important to “comprehensively strengthen the training of troops and prepare for war”, “resolutely safeguard national sovereignty” and “safeguard the overall strategic stability of the country”.

26 May: 

India's top military brass meets PM Modi amid escalating border tension with China

The meeting came hours after the top four generals briefed Defence Minister Rajnath Singh about the situation in Pangong Tso lake, Galwan Valley, Demchok and Daulat Beg Oldi where the Indian and Chinese troops were engaged in aggressive posturing for the last 20 days.

1 June: 

Amid the ongoing standoff between the Indian Army and China’s People Liberation Army at several locations in eastern Ladakh, Beijing said that the overall situation along the China-India border is stable and controllable.

Chinese fighters flying 30-35 kms from Eastern Ladakh, which india watched  closely

"The Chinese have kept a fleet of around 10-12 fighter aircraft stationed there at the moment and they are also carrying out flying activity close to the Indian territory. We are keeping a close eye on the movement of these J-11 and J-7 fighter aircraft,"

2 June: 

US Foreign Affairs Panel Chief Slams "Chinese Aggression" Against India

Elliot Engel, chief of the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, said that he was "extremely concerned" by the Chinese aggression against India along the Line of Actual Control in Ladakh and urged Beijing to "respect norms and use diplomacy and existing mechanisms to resolve its border questions".

China has moved up its forces along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) with India, US secretary of state Mike Pompeo said, asserting that authoritarian regimes take these kinds of actions.

6th June Development 

On this day the agreement was signed between india and china which was dishonored by china on the fateful night on which our 20 soldiers got martyred 

Senior military commanders of India and China held crucial talks on Saturday (June 6) in order to defuse the mounting tension along the border. The India delegation was led by Lt Gen Harinder Singh, Commander of the Leh-based 14 Corps while Major General Liu Lin, Commander of the South Xinjiang military region, led the Chinese side. The meeting was held at Moldo, opposite Chushul in eastern Ladakh.

"A meeting was held between the Corps Commander based in Leh and the Chinese Commander on 6 June 2020 in the Chushul-Moldo region. It took place in a cordial and positive atmosphere. Both sides agreed to peacefully resolve the situation in the border areas in accordance with various bilateral agreements and keeping in view the agreement between the leaders that peace and tranquility in the India-China border regions is essential for the overall development of bilateral relations," Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement on Sunday (June 7).

"Both sides also noted that this year marked the 70th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the two countries and agreed that an early resolution would contribute to the further development of the relationship. Accordingly, the two sides will continue the military and diplomatic engagements to resolve the situation and to ensure peace and tranquility in the border areas," added the statement.

Sources claimed that the talks did not lead to any major breakthrough but set the stage for further talks. It is learnt that during the meeting which lasted for around three hours, India asked China to reduce the mobilization of its troops near the Galwan valley and that the Chinese forces must return to their original location.

Meanwhile, China asked India to stop its road construction but Indian side clearly said that the construction is taking place inside the LAC and Beijing should not object the roadwork.

IN THE END I WOULD REQUEST SONIA MAM NOT TO WORRY ABOUT TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY OF INDIA , INDIA IS IN VERY SAFE HANDS , HAVE FAITH IN P.M. 

NARENDRA MODI AND OUR DEFENSE FORCES, CHINA WONT BE ABLE TO TAKE EVEN AN INCH OF OUR LAND

Adarsh Sinha 

(Indian Citizen)

Courtsey : 

zeenews

india today

https://www.iiss.org/

Political Kida

Other Critical Mistakes of Jawahar Lal Nehru

NOW LETS SEE WHAT OTHER MISTAKES HE DID THAT IS STILL HAUNTING INDIA AS OF TODAY .

1. Kashmir issue :  This issue is explained in my previous article

    CLICK TO SEE  -- NEHRU MISTAKES ON KASHMIR 

2. Refusing the Khan of Kalat's offer to accede to India

In 1947, the Khan of Kalat, a princely state in Balochistan, opted to join India rather than Pakistan. He sent Nehru signed accession papers that officially made Kalat a part of the Union of India. Nehru, for reasons best known to him, rejected Kalat's accession and returned the accession papers to the Khan, paving the way for Pakistan's invasion and annexation of Balochistan.

3. Obstructing Sardar Patel's plan to liberate Hyderabad from the murderous Nizam

After India's independence, Hyderabad's Nizam refused to accede to India, and unleashed a private army of over two lakh "Razakars" on the state's Hindu subjects, massacring at least thirty to forty thousand people, by conservative estimates. In response, Union Home Minister Sardar Patel decided to liberate the state using military force. PM Nehru opposed the plan and tried to scuttle it. He insulted and humiliated Patel, calling him "a complete communalist" in a meeting. Patel went ahead despite Nehru's best efforts, and launched Operation Polo that liberated Hyderabad.

4. Gifting Manipur's Kabo valley to Burma

The lush, fertile and resource-rich Kabo valley, which measures over 11,000 sq km, has been part of the kingdom of Manipur at least as far back as 1450, according to historical records. After the British annexed Manipur, they leased the valley to Burma in 1834, in consultation with Maharaja Gambhir Singh of Manipur. In return, Burma paid the kingdom of Manipur sicca rupees 500 monthly as compensation, with the clear stipulation that Manipur retained the right to reclaim the land at any time. The compensation was paid until Manipur became a part of the Union of India, at which point it became incumbent upon the Government of India to reclaim the land. However, instead of reclaiming the territory, Nehru gifted it to Burma in 1954.

5. Gifting the strategically located Coco Islands to Burma

The Great Coco Island and the Little Coco island form the northernmost part of the Andaman archipelago. India's former defence minister George Fernandes revealed that PM Nehru gifted these islands to Burma after India's independence. Subsequently, Burma handed them over to China, which has established an extensive electronic surveillance station on the larger of the islands, to keep an eye on India's military and naval activities in the Bay of Bengal, giving it a crucial strategic advantage in India's backyard.

6. Hostility towards Sardar Patel's restoration of the Somnath Temple

After India's Independence, Union Home Minister Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel pledged to rebuild the Somnath temple that was last destroyed by the Mughal despot Aurangzeb. Nehru opposed the project tooth and nail, terming it "Hindu revivalism". Despite Nehru's hostility, the strong-willed Patel completed the restoration. When President Rajendra Prasad was invited to inaugurate the temple, Nehru "advised" him to dissociate himself with the event, in the interest of "preserving the secular fabric of the Indian Republic". Prasad too, ignored Nehru's advice.

7. Rejecting American & Soviet offers of a permanent seat for India at the UNSC

In 1950, soon after India's independence, the United States offered India a permanent seat at the United Nations Security Council. PM Nehru rejected the offer, saying that he would not accept any offer that came at the cost of China. In 1955, the US repeated the offer in tandem with the USSR, in a rare instance of agreement between the cold war enemies. Nehru again rejected the offer, insisting that priority be given to China instead of India. Nehru ensured that China got a Permanent seat at the UN Security Council, at the expense of India. Today, thanks to Nehru, China has unlimited opportunities to repeatedly harm India's interests at the UN.

8. Refusing the Sultan of Oman's gift of Gwadar port

The Sultan of Oman offered the port of Gwadar to India in 1958. Nehru rejected the offer. Pakistan subsequently bought the strategically-located port, which today is the lynchpin of China's CPEC segment of its massive Belt and Road project.

9. Preventing Nepal from re-joining India

In the early 1950s, Nepal's King Tribhuvan offered to merge Nepal with India. However, for reasons best known to him, Nehru rejected the offer, spurning the opportunity to regain India’s historic territory.

10. Rejecting US President Kennedy's offer to help India become Asia's first nuclear power

Much before China became the first Asian nation to test a nuclear device, US President John F Kennedy had offered to help India build and detonate one in the Rajasthan desert. Kennedy sent PM Nehru a hand-written note making the offer. Kennedy's letter emphasized that “Nothing is more important than national security”. Nehru turned down Kennedy's offer. Had Nehru accepted Kennedy's offer of assistance, India would have been the first Asian nuclear power, ahead of China. China would not have dared invade India in 1962, nor would Pakistan have, in 1965. Had Nehru accepted Kennedy's offer of assistance, India would have been a founding member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group.

11. Signing the most unequal treaty in history

In 1960, PM Nehru, for the sake of "friendship" and "goodwill" signed one of the most unequal, lopsided treaties ever — the Indus Waters Treaty, giving Pakistan ownership of over three-fourths of the water the flows through the Indus System of Rivers located in India. Pakistan reciprocated Nehru's gesture of goodwill by invading India just five years later.

12. Giving up on Tibet, placing India's water security and northern border at China's mercy

When indications mounted that China, under Mao Zedong, was preparing to invade Tibet, Nehru refused to even contemplate the idea of using military force to deter the Chinese. The invasion eventually happened in 1950, rendering India's northern border undemarcated and insecure, and placing Tibet's immense water resources, upon which India depends, squarely in China's hands. Furthermore, Nehru did not make any effort to settle the border dispute with the Chinese, which led to the 1962 war with China.

13. 1962 Himalayan Blunder: the India-China war disaster

Nehru's inept and myopic foreign policy, lack of foresight, hare-brained "forward policy", and grounding of the Indian Air Force led to India's humiliating defeat in the 1962 war with China, and the loss of the Aksai Chin peninsula among several other territories.

                   TODAYS SENARIO IS BEAUTIFULLY EXPLAINED  IN THIS MEME

COURTESY :  MY NATION

NOTE : PLEASE NOTE THAT THE INFORMATION AND PICTURES GIVEN ABOVE ARE NOT OWNED BY ME. ITS COMPILATION OF VARIOUS INFO AVAILABLE ON PUBLIC DOMAIN.

Questionable Jawahar Lal Nehrus Actions ( Kashmir Issue )

First Prime minister  Jawahar Lal Nehru , who is popularly known as Chacha Nehru took some actions in the past which raises lot of questions even today , so just thought of clubbing them together. Here are those actions and decisions of Jawahar Lal Nehru which are a problem for india even today.

BLUNDERS THAT GAVE RISE TO KASHMIR ISSUE 

The first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, of India had committed several mistakes in the resolution of Kashmir issue. First time, since India got independence, in a Parliament that Prime Minister had delivered a bold speech and blamed Pandit Nehru about the Kashmir issue and PM Modi is absolutely correct in blaming Pandit Nehru for the entire Kashmir mess.

Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru did several mistakes which could had been avoided easily if Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel were the Prime Minister of India.  Apart from the formation of POK which Pandit Nehru unable to control, let me list down his other mistakes because of which People of J&K have been suffering since 1947:


Maharaja had already accepted it and then GOI had acknowledged him about the same. So J&K was never a dispute state after Maharaja had signed the accession. Why Pandit Nehru took the case to the UN? And still that case has been lingering in the UN since Jan 1948 and people of my state have been suffering because of miscarriage of Kashmir plan by Pandit Nehru. Pakistan, Abdullah Family and separatists are using this angle to prove that Kashmir is still not the part of India. But they never mentioned about the Maharaja’s letter and his approval of accession. If Kashmir were not in the UN, Pakistan and fringe elements in the valley would never get the reason to spread their propaganda.

THE SHEIKH ABDULLA FACTOR 

 Close friendship of Jawaharlal Nehru and Sheikh Abdulla: 

Jawaharlal Nehru disliked Maharaja Hari Singh from the beginning. Sheikh Abdulla launched “Quit Kashmir Movement” in 1946 for which he was jailed by Maharaja. Nehru wanted to intervene in the issue and when he entered into the state he was stopped by Maharaja’s troops. Nehru took it as an insult and never forgave Maharaja. Hari Singh knew about this friendship and therefore hesitated to sign Indian IOA. Later on Nehru pressurized Maharaja to appoint Sheikh Abdullah as Prime Minister of State.

Too Much Trust on Sheikh Abdullah: 
Nehru blindly trusted Sheikh and later difference grew between them to such an extent that that Sheikh was arrested by central government in 1953. When Indian Army was ready to recapture the area taken by Pakistani invaders, Nehru didn’t approved army to advance further. It was Sheikh who suggested Nehru not to advance further as the area beyond was not Kashmiri. In 1953, Sheikh was charged with conspiring against India, helping Pakistan to annex J&K and inciting communal disharmony.

Not allowing Indian Army to completely recapture the area annexed by Pathan invaders: 

On 21/22 October 1947 an army of 5000 Pathan tribesmen (Army supported by Pakistan) invaded the state. Once the Maharaja signed IOA, Indian Army began one of the biggest operation in history. Within few days Indian army won many important points and recaptured Baramulla thereby removing danger to the city of Srinagar. To completely annihilate the invaders Indian Army waited for approval from high command to attack on their base and drove them out. Nehru didn’t allowed to attack further and logged the case in U.N.O (United Nation Organization). To this day the area is not recaptured and known as POJK (Pakistan Occupied Jammu & Kashmir).

Escalating the issue into United Nations: 

Jawaharlal Nehru didn’t allowed Indian Army to attack further and recapture the area

but lodged the complaint (suggested by Lord Mountbatten) to the United Nation’s Security Council thereby making it an international issue. The solution provided by UN Commission was “Issue would be resolved by democratic means of plebiscite once the Pakistan withdrew its troops from captured territory”. India declared ceasefire on 1st January and Pakistan never removed its forces from captured land.

The question still unanswered in : 

Why did Nehru take the Kashmir issue to the UN when Sardar Patel was so sure of solving the problem with a few more days in hand?

Too much Trust on British: 

It is said that Nehru trusted British more than the Indian generals and in case of Kashmir issue he took command in his own hand (for rest of India it was done by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel). For issues related to Kashmir he consulted Lord Mountbatten and other English Generals. As per the British, initially they had intention to cede J&K to Pakistan. British Officers supported the Pakistan Army to capture the Gilgit-Baltistan region of J&K by supporting them in terms of arms and strategic plans.

 Giving higher share of Assembly seats to Kashmir Region than Jammu Region: 

During the formation of Jammu & Kashmir Assembly the Congress government gave the control of State to Kashmir region by giving it 43 seats out of total 75 seats. It is to be noted, both by area and number of voters Jammu region should have got higher share. No any official census or surveys were done and government gifted more than 50% of assembly seats to Kashmir Valley thereby making it impossible for Jammu to play any pivotal role. To pass any law or abolish article 370 it should be passed in J& K assembly and by this scenario it was made impossible. Till date the unequal distribution of seats makes it difficult for other parties to form government. The state politics is controlled by Kashmir Valley which in turn supports Pakistan and Separatist leaders. (At present Kashmir region has 46 seats, Jammu has 37 seats and Ladakh has 4 seats).

At present the Kashmir has 46 seats and Jammu has 37 seats. It is to be noted that the refugees can vote in central election but not in the assembly election.
At present the Kashmir has 46 seats and Jammu has 37 seats. It is to be noted that the refugees can vote in central election but not in the assembly election. In right separatist leader who oppose India’s control on J&K

Malpractices carried by him and his government during first election of State in 1951: 

To conduct the first election in the valley the Central government (Congress) committed blunder mistakes. First no census were carried out and census of 1941 was not taken into account (1941 census population data: Jammu- 20 Lakh, Kahsmir-17 lakh and Ladakh/Gilgit-3 lakh). Second, in the election National Conference won all 75 seats (Note-winners of first election were about to draft the constitution of J&K!). 73 members won without any opposition and 2 members (Not Muslim) who filed their nomination got death threats and they backed off. Third, after election the motion of acceptance of election was moved in Indian Parliament and in spite of opposition by leaders like S.P Mookerjee it was passed in Parliament (Note- Congress at that time has 364 members in Parliament).

Used his power to pass article 306-A 

which ultimately became source of article 370: In its initial days article 370 was not in scene and instead article 306-A was drafted. Nehru sent Sheikh to Dr. B.R Ambedkar to draft an appropriate constitution for state but Dr. Ambedkar rejected it saying:

             “Mr. Abdullah, you want India should defend Kashmir, India should develop Kashmir and Kashmiris should have equal right as citizens of India, but you don’t want India and any citizen of India to have any rights in Kashmir. I am the Law Minister of India. I cannot betray the interest of my country”.

When Dr. Ambedkar refused to draft the article, Nehru asked Gopalaswami Ayyangar to draft the article. Once the article was prepared Nehru used his absolute majority in parliament to pass the article.

Giving excessive power to the State Legislature of Jammu & Kashmir: 

While drafting the constitution of Jammu & Kashmir excessive power was given to the state legislature. The state legislature was empowered to make laws on all state subjects including implementation of laws and deciding who are the citizen of J&K. According to J&K, person who has domicile in Jammu & Kashmir would be regarded as citizen of India though the reverse would not be acceptable. Similarly the state has not implemented IPC (Indian Penal Code) and it has its own RPC (Ranbir Penal Code).

Hiding important information from Indian Parliament:

 Nehru kept the entire Parliament in dark and with the help of President of India passed the order of 1954 that significantly affected the Indian control on state. On 14th May 1954 Nehru forced president of India to pass “Order Constitution” which was applicable to state of J&K. This came into force as article 35A of Indian Constitution. This article deals with employment, acquisition of property, settlement, scholarships and other important aspects of state. In this order many exceptions and modifications were made but the entire Indian Parliament was not informed about it. You would be surprised to know that armed with these power the state has refused to add the word “Secular” in its constitution that was added to Indian constitution after 42nd Amendment.

So we can see how the mistakes committed by our Prime Minister has dragged the entire country and state in unending chaos. Had if few precautions were made and personal relationship was kept aside the story of state would have been different. Article 370 came with temporary provision but now it has effectively became permanent.

Article 370: 

Sardar Patel was firmly against article 370 and he had expressed his anger against it as:

“Neither Sheikh Abdullah not Goplaswamy is permanent. The future would depend upon the strength and guts of Indian government and if we cannot have confidence in our strength we do not deseverve to exist as a nation”.

Was Pandit Nehru against article 370? If we do research on this, we will come to know that he was neither against article 370 nor in its favor. Let me take the case that he was against Article 370, which many liberals and intellectuals have been writing, if he was really against it why he didn’t abrogate it? He was the Prime Minister of India for almost 16yrs but he was unable to abrogate it. If Sardar patel were Prime Minister, Article 370 would have never been part of an Indian constitution.

Revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir

It was finally abrogated by Narendra Modi Government on 5 August 2019 in a master stroke  after a careful planning , the Indian Home Minister Amit Shah moved a resolution in the Rajya Sabha to give the President the necessary recommendation he needs to declare Article 370 as inoperative Subsequently, the statutory resolution seeking the revocation of the special status under Article 370 and the bill for the state's reorganization

 was debated and passed by the Rajya Sabha on 5 August 2019 with 125 (67%) votes in its favour and 61 (33%) against it.On 6 August, the bill for the reorganisation was debated and passed by the Lok Sabha with 370 (86%) votes in its favour and 70 (14%) against it, and the resolution recommending the revocation was passed by 351 votes in favour and 72 against


Kashmir in United Nations:

On January 1, 1948 India took the case to the United Nations under the leadership of Pandit Nehru. He took the case in UN to get the solution of dispute state as per International law. But the question is, Was J&K considered as dispute state? The simple answer was NO. Because Maharaja Hari Singh had accepted J&K as part of India and signed the instrument of accession in October 26, 1947. In a letter to Lord Mountbatten he wrote:

“With the conditions obtaining at present in my State and great emergency of the situation as it exists, I have no option but to ask for help from Indian Dominion. I have accordingly decided to do so and I attach the Instrument of Accession for the acceptance by your Government”

Release of Sheikh Abdullah from Jail: This was not mistake but blunder by Pandit Nehru. 

He and then the chief minister of J&K, G.M. Sadiq, adopted soft attitude towards Sheikh Abdullah and released him on 8th April, 1964. Abdullah was jailed by Nehru when Sardar Patel pressurized him. Abdullah was charged with perfidy, betrayal and treachery against India. He was pretending to be loyal to India but the quisling was doing lot of anti-national activities and had propagated two nation theory also. But why he was released? Only Pandit Nehru himself can answer this. Soon after his release, Abdullah had started anti-national activities in the valley and in order to get support from neighbors, he visited Pakistan and met Ayub Khan. He travelled China to meet the Prime Minister Chou En-Lai in 1965. On his return he was arrested at Delhi Airport. But the most unfortunate thing was Sardar Patel died of heart attack in 1950. If he were alive, another blunder by Pandit Nehru could have been easily averted and entire Kashmir mess would have been avoided.




NOW LETS SEE OTHER CRITICAL MISTAKES DONE BY JAWAHARLAL HEHRU 

Latest Trap of Anti nationals - Using name of known nationalists

Latest Trap of Anti nationals 

Using name of known nationalists 

 Article By Adarsh Sinha

Background :  Recently they have come up with a new and effective  strategy of trapping nationalist by making or converting their handle on the name of some nationalist person who are in news and are a hot trending in twitter on hashtags .

Initially when i saw the first account on name on the name of Arnab Goswami Sir, i thought someone must be doing it to increase followers which many people do , little did i realise what it may lead to .

Since the above mentioned are known for there patriotism and strong nationalist approach so antinationals are targeting them .

How they operate

SELECTION OF TARGET 

Suppose its Arnab Goswami whose official twitter i.d. is @arnabgoswamirtv. they generally target the person who is a known nationalist fighting with antinatonalS , and is under some controversy, same is with sudhir chaudhary and sambit patra, but there main target appears to be Arnab Goswami, so in this article we will take example of Arnab Goswami, the most dynamic, fearless and influential journalist , a true patriot. Owner and Editor in Chief of Republic T.V.  His ideology reflects in Republic T.V. logo. NATION FIRST NO COMPROMISE

Example : Recently 200 FIR were filed against Arnab Goswami and at that time he was the most talked about person on twitter with nationalist trending #isupportarnab and antinationals trending #arrestarnabgoswami

RESETTING THERE ACCOUNT

Delete History :  Seeing Arnab fighting against antinationals and lutyans lobby , they selected his as target . they go on to delete all there tweets , follwers and follwings . , so now they have made there account with 0 followers 0 followings and 0 tweets. like a new account.

Account Makeover : They do complete makeover of there account , name themself as Arnab Goswami , Uses his picture , Republic T.V. logo and pics , giving it a look of Arnab Goswami twitter account and change there handle to the name of Arnab Goswami .

Retweets :   Next step is to retweet tweets of  known nationalist accounts and also of arnab goswami original account  giving it a nationalist history.

Writing on pro arnab hashtags :   Then they go for the kill , they start writing on pro arnab hashtags  like #arnabgoswami  #isupportarnab and slams antinationals in anti arnab hashtags.

Creating Followers 

Format of first tweet  

" Friends Arnab Goswami here , because of my nationalist and fearless journalism , i have been victimized , i need support of nationalist people , please follow me to show your support to me"

Nationalist accounts stupidly start following them and start interacting with him , without even thinking that Arnab Goswami is at a level in which he doesnt have to ask for followers,

Poll Strategy

Conduct Polls : They start conducting polls like 

•  Do you support me . yes or no

•  Was attack on me and my wife is justified 

•  Am i justified in questioning congress on palghar

•  Today supreme court gave me clean chit , are you happy with  Supreme Court Decision .

Soon nationalists rush to follow him , they reach 20k followers with in no time .

Follow and Followback Game :   They after reaching this level they focus aggressively only on  making followers and making groups. there tweets at this stage are in this format .

Today i will be giving follow back to all nationalist accounts who follow me .

By your support i have reached 14 k today have to complete 15 k today, will give follow back to all who follow me .

within a month by using these tactics they get 100k followers within a short period of one month, people who follow them dont even know that within next 15 days all will be unfollowed

Making Private Groups :  They then concentrate on making private groups . and the format of the tweet is .

Today i am making nationalist groups , dm me who all wishes to join. 

Innocent Nationalists who cant analyze the trap they are falling into ,happily join the groups , which gives these antinationals access to thought process of nationalists and influence decisions  cleverly guiding them to do which is a part of  there plan.

They also get easy access to already operating nationalist groups , in groups nationalist use all kind of reportable  language thinking that its only is seen by his friends of same ideology , not knowing that fake account of arnab goswami is observ ing them and reporting them to twitter with cc to its masters.

These things go on for 20 days , they tweet aggressively and using all kind of tactics and within no time they reach followers upto 100k 

The Coverup  

During the process of making followers they are vulnerable to get reported as fake account or impersonating account , so on reaching there target they make certain changes in there account.

Adding word unofficial and parody .Once they reach there goals of having 100k followers in just one month,  they add the word unofficial or parody in the profile to protect them legally .

Unfollow all those who followed. : To give a look of a celebrity account , they unfollow almost all having less folowers , the same ones whom followed him in order to get a followback from arnab goswami.

Delete the initial tweets in which they asked for followers and follow-back or claimed that they are real arnab goswami .

   FINAL PHASE 

Then they go for final kill and start spreading fake news and antinational agenda , and those tweets are read by 100k followers , attacking there mind again and again and cleverly make them rethink there inclination towards  , Prime Minister Modi , highlight small mistake as disaster , in private groups as well as openly.

==============================================

LIVE EXAMPLES OF ARNAB FAKE ACCOUNTS WHO FOLLOWED SAME STRATEGY .

I saw four fake accounts , who followed the same process and tactic 

1. @unoffarnab  -  Twitter Page 

KIND OF TWEETS MADE 

As you can see all tweets are to promote antinational agenda on the name of arnab goswami , still he sometimes pose as arnab goswami and write antinational tweets . 

   Account Formed    : March 2016  (4 Years Back )

   Following              : 79

   Followers               : 24.9 k

   Stage                      : Final Stage.

============================================

2. Arnab522

   Account Formed    : March 2016  (4 Years Back )

   Following  : 1274

   Followers  : 103 k

   Last Tweet in twitter History : 26th April 2020  means all tweets done before 26th April 2020 has been deleted.

   (Means this account went a makeover on 26th April 2020, the time when palghar controversy was at its peak  ) 
    
Status : 

Third Stage ( He followed exactly the same procedure as mentioned above , makeover, followers , groups, follow backs , nationalist tweets . fooled nationalists by followback and then unfollow them , which you can easily make out by seeing the difference between followers and followings) 

Good thing is that he hasnt reached  final stage yet , of spreading hatred and make antinational tweets..

Exactly same is with other  accounts mentioned 

@ArnawMGoswami  followed exactly same patters as by @arnab522  ,the addition is that as you can see in the profile the area marked in red box , he used every credential of Arnab Goswami , his designation, logo , republic tv website , which is violation of copyright  and in between the long statement has used the word parody , which is visible only if you thoroughly check the account  .

   Account Formed    : April 2017  (3 Years Back )

   Following  : 135

   Followers  : 109.6 k

   Last Tweet in twitter History : 27th Feb 2020  means at the time when whole india was discussing DELHI RIOTS 


 all tweets done before 27th Feb 2020  has been deleted.

   (Means this account went a makeover on 27th Feb 2020 , the time when palghar controversy was at its peak  ) 

@arnabrepublic_1

This is a recently made account in may 2020 but is following exactly the same procedure , which is very much evident seeing the following 

Date of account formation : 08/05/2010

Todays Date                       : 15/02/2020

No of followers in 7 days  : 1016

Status : Havent written word Parody or Unofficial in his profile .

Tweeting agressively with single point program of making followers .

Polls , Follow Followback Game Using Jai Shri Raam to grab maximum hindu nationalists as followers , 

MY AIM OF WRITING THIS ARTICLE IS TO PROTECT MY REAL HINDU FRIENDS FROM THESE FAKESTERS ACCOUNTS USING NAME OF WELL KNOWN NATIONALIST , BY FOLLOWING THEM OR INTERACTING WITH THEM YOU ARE NOT ONLY PUTTING YOURSELF IN TROUBLE BUT ALSO PUTTING NATION IN TROUBLE. 

IF YOU  FOLLOW THEM BACK TO GET THERE FOLLOWBACK THEN REMEMBER YOU WILL BE UNFOLLOWED WITHIN NEXT 20 DAYS . 

YOU MAKE YOURSELF VULNERABLE TO THE POSSIBILITY OF BEING REPORTED OR SUSPENDED .

I REALLY DONT KNOW WHY FAKE ACCOUNTS OF ARNAB GOSWAMI ARE COMING UP ONE AFTER ANOTHER AND WHAT ARE THERE PLANS , BUT IF YOU ARE REALLY NATIONALIST AND LOVE YOUR COUNTRY THEN STAY AWAY FROM THESE PARODY  ACCOUNTS , YOU MAY GET INTO TROUBLE SOME DAY. ITS AN ADVICE , THE DECISION IS YOURS.

views are personal, , this article is based on analysis and cyber investigation carried by me , i dont own any screen shot or pictures used in this article